Wealth Management

RETIRING EARLY – GET ON TRACK

Financial freedom is what many of us dream of, and this is why we save so hard throughout our lives for our retirement. For most of us, retiring ‘early’ would be great but is it realistic?

Nathan Smith
Wealth Management Consultant
26 April 2022
5 minutes

Many individuals I speak to are saving for their retirement but often have no idea of how much they need in their pension to fund their lifestyle throughout retirement, often because they have not thought carefully about life in retirement. In hope rather than expectation, they may choose to believe that the amounts contributed each month from their salaries will be enough. Leaving it until they are looking to retire before they seek advice can mean opportunities could have been lost. It is an area where professional advice can make all the difference and, as with so many savings plans, it is usually best to get clarity of thought and action as early as possible. Do not put off until tomorrow what can be done today!

My top tip prior to speaking to an adviser is to have a budget in place. This is important because it allows you to think objectively about your lifestyle both now and in the future. It is notoriously difficult to fast forward into retirement and assess how much of an income you may need. Certain expenses such as your mortgage or school fees may no longer be payable. Equally, you may decide you wish to travel more in retirement. By starting this exercise, you at least have an idea and, like any plan, it is a living document that will change with time.

Another reason a budget is so important is because it allows you to identify potential surplus funds that could be used to boost your savings ahead of retirement. Let us work on an example of Mr and Mrs Maisel.

Mr and Mrs Maisel have outgoings each year including luxuries and holidays of £50,000. They want to retire at age 60 and believe their outgoings will remain unchanged throughout their retirement. As such, they would need to build up a total pot of around £1 million. This is on the basis that their investments are targeted to grow in value by 5% each year (after any associated investment costs). Assuming they were to only draw this growth at the end of each year, this would allow them to maintain the capital amount invested of £1 million throughout their retirement, which offers them the ability to drawdown into the capital if required in any given year, for example for care costs. Any undrawn pension at death will pass to nominated beneficiaries free of inheritance tax (IHT) under current legislation.

A pension fund of around £750,000, given the same assumptions as above, would only last until age 89 at which point the pension would be exhausted. However, if both individuals were entitled to their full state pensions from age 67 (c.£9,628 each – £19,256 total based on 2022/23 tax year values), they would be able to reduce the amount being drawn at this time, although until age 67 they are likely to be dipping into their capital.

A word of warning, however: growth rates of 5% cannot be guaranteed and in times of market stress the value of investments may fall. This is why, when embarking on a withdrawal strategy, regular annual reviews with a financial adviser are so important.

The value of a pension fund depends on both the contributions made over time (including any tax reliefs) and the investment performance of the underlying assets held in the fund. Having an investment strategy that reflects your long-term objectives and your capacity and willingness to undertake risk is therefore equally important. You can find more information on this in my recent article here.

Continuing our example, Mr and Mrs Maisel have now reached age 60 (retirement age) and have built up combined pension funds of £750,000. Making the income as tax efficient as possible will provide greater net income.

Assuming Mrs Maisel has built up her pension pot to £500,000 and Mr Maisel £250,000, when it comes to drawing from the pension scheme, both will be able to draw 25% tax free, with the remaining 75% being taxed at their marginal rate of tax. However, it is clear to see that if they were to draw £25,000 per annum each, for example to maximise tax allowances, Mr Maisel’s pension is going to run out much sooner. At that time, Mrs Maisel will need to draw more from her fund if they are to reach the desired level of income and this might mean she is pushed into a higher-rate tax band. When they reach age 67, their state pension will commence, assuming they are entitled.

With advanced planning, Mr and Mrs Maisel might have been encouraged to try to build up funds of the same size – say £375,000 each, for example. This would allow them both to draw similar levels of income throughout their retirement (c.£25,000 each), thus allowing them to reduce the amounts of income in higher-rate tax bands. The benefit of this is that less income is required from the pension to cover the higher-rate tax. When you look at the potential tax savings over their lifetime this could be significant. Given that Mrs and Mr Maisel are not having to build up their pensions to cover for increased tax throughout their retirement, they may be able to retire earlier.

There are several important considerations when it comes to this type of planning, such as the ages of the couple or the possibility of life-changing events such as serious ill health or even divorce.

To make sure you are on the right track for achieving your retirement goals, you should start planning as soon as you can. Booking regular reviews with your trusted adviser can ensure you are maximising all the opportunities available to you.

Start a conversation today
Get in touch with a member of the Mattioli Woods team below. We are always on hand to assist.
Did you enjoy this article?
Share on social
FacebookTwitterPintrestWhatsappLinkedInFacebook Messenger
meeting
Get in touch with the Mattioli Woods team
Do you have a specific question or query? Find the right member of the
Mattioli Woods team.